Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Term limits – who needs them?

President Mamadou Tandja of Niger has joined the club of leaders who have overturned constitutions to overstay their welcome in recent years. Following victory in the referendum held on 4 August, he is the twelfth African leader in a decade to engineer a third term of office. Has the tide turned against the ‘third wave’ of democratization in Africa?

Term limits were introduced by more than half of Africa’s states between 1990-1994. They came as part of a ‘democracy package’ that included multi-party competitive elections, freedom of the press and constitutionalism. They were meant to end the practice of presidency for life, when dictators were ousted only by a coup d’etat or death, or both in many cases.

This democratic trend has been reversed in the new millennium, starting with President Nujoma of Namibia in 1999. Then followed: President Diouf of Senegal, Conte of Guinea, the late Eyadema of Togo and the late Bongo of Gabon, Compaore of Burkina Faso, Deby of Chad, Ben Ali of Tunisia and Museveni of Uganda. In 2008 Bouteflika of Algeria and Biya of Cameroon joined the list of leaders past their sell-by dates. Most amazing is that President Biya himself introduced term limits to Cameroon in 1996, only to scrap them when his retirement loomed.

Some leaders have tried and failed to amend constitutions for a third term in office, in Malawi, Nigeria and Zambia. Robust opposition from civil society organizations, political parties and the media has seen off these attempts. Others have gone gracefully, like Nelson Mandela and Joachim Chissano. Thabo Mbeki promised he would not seek a third term, but was spared the opportunity to prove his good intentions.

It is a disturbing pattern that has gone on all the while that the OAU has been reformed into the African Union. The regional organization signed its own new constitution in 2000, with principles of democracy and provision for sanctions against unconstitutional changes of government. New institutions were set up to protect democracy, including the Peace and Security Council, the Pan-African Parliament and the African Peer Review Mechanism (of NEPAD).

The African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance was adopted by the AU in January 2007. Article 23 of the Charter defined unconstitutional changes of government as ‘illegal means of accessing or maintaining power’, including ‘any amendment or revision of the constitution or legal instruments, which is an infringement on the principles of democratic change of government’. Sanctions are to be implemented by the AU against any government that tampers with its constitution in this way.

The immediate problem for the AU is that this charter has not yet entered into force. Not even South Africa has ratified it. The regional body has implemented sanctions in a number of countries. But this has only been in cases of coups d’etat. There is no precedent for sanctions against an incumbent president. It doesn’t help that Gaddafi currently chairs the AU and has expressed his distaste for democracy from this platform. Niger’s best hope is for joint action by the UN, AU and ECOWAS, led by the AU’s former peace and security commissioner, Said Djinnit. He is now leading this mission to Niger as the special representative to the UN Secretary General for West and Central Africa.

Do Africa’s leaders really need term limits? Many would point to the Westminster system to say that democracy doesn’t need this mechanism. Zimbabwe is one of the few countries that did not introduce term limits because of its parliamentary tradition. Robert Mugabe has certainly proved the rule that power corrupts over time. But if a leader is genuinely popular, the people should be allowed to vote to keep them. The problem is when a leader begins manipulating institutions to override democratic choices.

Counting the cases, Africa seems to have taken two steps forward, then one step backward in the consolidation of democracy since the 1990s. Civil society will have to be nimble to keep up with the changes.

Dr Kathryn Sturman, Acting Head, SAIIA Governance of Africa’s Resources Programme


The SAIIA Governance of Africa's Resources Programme is funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and facilitated through the Royal Embassy of Norway in Pretoria, South Africa.

Email updates

Call For Papers

SAJIA Call for Papers

Follow us

Facebook linkedin Linked In
Twitter    

Resources

img_logo_africa_portal_colour_sm

aprm_logo_toolkit_02.png
aprm_logo_amp_toolkit_01

SAIIA Podcasts

img podcast new logoLISTEN!
SAIIA's examines foreign policy issues in Mozambique, SA and the BRICS and the impact of Iranian oil sanctions on SA.

Click Here To Listen >>

 

 

SAIIA In The News

 

Goodwill and Hard Bargains: The DRC, China and India

by Gregory Mthembu-Salter
SAIIA Occasional Paper No 114, March 2012
Download-English [.pdf]

more>

 

China in Kenya: Addressing Counterfeit Goods and Construction Sector Imbalances

by Hilary Patroba
SAIIA Occasional Paper No 110, March 2012
Download-English [pdf.]

more>

 

South Africa as Africa’s Gateway: A Perspective From Business

by Dianna Games
SAIIA Policy Briefing 46, March 2012
Download-English [pdf].

more>
 

The Tripartite FTA and the Services Sector

by Matthew Stern
SAIIA Policy Briefing 45, February 2012
Download-English [pdf].

more>
   

Features Archive

Click here to view the Features Archive

Bookmark and Share


© SAIIA 2012; NPO:058-556 Site maintained by BIG Media